The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
发生在我外婆身上的故事，OpenAI CEO萨姆·奥特曼很早就预测到，这位科技新贵去年就披露过ChatGPT的年龄使用情况，甚至用它作为对竞争对手的宣战：。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
，详情可参考同城约会
Что думаешь? Оцени!。服务器推荐对此有专业解读
Kevin Church,Science team